Reflection on Research Experience

August 2nd, 2007 by Julie Sogani

The last eight weeks in the lab have definitely been one of most fun and rewarding summers I have had. I highly recommend this program to  those especially who have even the slightest interest in science, because it can be a real eye opener into what a research career is all about. It is one of those important “outside classroom learning experiences” in which you can bring together your knowledge from introductory science classes and then apply it to real life experiments. I have learned how doing experiments in a research lab is an entirely different–and dare I say more stimulating–experience than doing experiments in class labs. Working in a biomedical lab, you actually feel like you’re doing something worthwhile that could one day help people by working behind the scenes.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            Having spent the summer doing research, I now feel prepared to work in the lab during the school year, and to think that I still have three years ahead of me to do so is one of the great advantages of getting started early through the Howard Hughes Research Fellows Program. I think I have learned just as much working in a lab as I would have taking summer courses. Getting accustomed to reading scientific papers, learning techniques, and writing scientifically are all skills that we never really learn in class but through the program I have gotten very familiar with. Also getting the chance to present my own research through chalk talks and a poster and listening to professors talk about their research interests in our weekly seminars has allowed me to get an in-depth idea of what research at Duke is like and encouraged me to consider research as a career.                                                                                                                                                                                         

If at first you don’t succeed…

July 24th, 2007 by Julie Sogani

So last week was definitely the busiest week of the program. On Wednesday, I presented during our weekly lab meeting, wrote an abstract, and created a poster. I never used Powerpoint as much as I did in that short stretch of time and thanks to that I am a wiz at it! The lab meeting was probably the hardest task to complete, just because I was presenting for other lab members who were familiar with my topic unlike during the chalk talks and had much more to cover pertaining to methods and data. But it really helped to make sure I understood everything beforehand and be able to convey it myself to others. On to our experiments…on Friday after running our Western blot for the third time, we finally got very promising data (essentially we found a very specific domain on ”protein X” that is required for interaction with ALK-1). It’s so exciting to finally get successful data! Since that data will be on my poster, I will post my previous (slightly unsuccessful) western blots from my lab presentation, just to show what I’ve been working on for the past three weeks.                           

 

Career Considerations

July 15th, 2007 by Julie Sogani

On Wednesday, the program hosted a career panel of graduate students, post-docs and MD/Phds. Before I came to Duke, I always thought I wanted to be a physician. But after trying new classes and spending the summer doing research, I have become more open-minded about all the other wonderful career choices. Pursuing medical research that can be applied to treating/preventing human diseases would fulfill both my aspiration to do hands-on science and help people. I have always found science to tackle intriguing questions that make me want to learn more and that’s what led me to apply to the HHMI research program in the first place. Though I have found research to be a slow process, the idea that I could discover something new and make a contribution to the scientific community makes research all the more worth it. If I continue to be ambitious I might try to get both a Phd and MD like my P.I. To keep up with the clinical aspect, once a week he works in a clinic with pancreatic cancer patients so that he gets to work in the best of both worlds. One postdoc recommended we try working in the biology industry as with the boom in technology it is constantly expanding. In high school, a parent who is an MD and works in a pharmaceutical firm visited to tell us about her career. I found it fascinating that she got to use her understanding of the human body to help create new drugs and test them in clincal trials. What ever career I decide to pursue, I’m sure with the ever expanding field of biology and research, science will be intertwined in it.

Research Status: Cloned, Sequenced and Ready for the Real Stuff

July 8th, 2007 by Julie Sogani

So because Wednesday was July 4th, this week has been slower than usual but nonetheless much was accomplished. First, on Friday Jack and I presented an article about TGF-B signalling in prostate cancer stromal cells for our lab’s biweekly journal club meeting. It was interesting to learn about what approaches other labs are doing to study TGF-B. We did another Western blot to detect if our ”protein X” fragments were successfully expressed. However, since we still didn’t detect any signal for the fragments of interest, we immunoprecipitated the fragments with an antibody before doing the Western to reduce any nonspontaneous proteins binding to the membrane. As far as the mutagenesis experiment is going, we have transformed and minipreped the truncation mutants (1-193, 1-200) and the point mutant (V175A) and sent those for sequencing. On Friday, we found out that luckily one of samples of ”protein X” 140-215 had the correct sequence so we will be able to maxiprep the bacteria and be ready to use it for future experiments.

Midprogram Update

June 29th, 2007 by Julie Sogani

This week we have been busy presenting our chalk talks to our fellow students and this afternoon Dr. Willard will be lecturing about genomics. I enjoyed listening to everyone’s talks and found it particularly interesting when a familiar technique, cell line, etc. was mentioned, reminding me just how much I have learned these past four weeks. On Monday I followed Tam and did my first maxiprep, a technique to grow large quantities of bacteria with your cloned vectors and later transfected those in Cos-7 cells. Tuesday I ran a gel to check our miniprep products from the previous week so that Wednesday we were able to send the DNA (”protein X” fragments 1-139 and 140-215) for sequencing. We also started our mutagenesis experiments and are busy PCRing, digesting and transforming these past two days. Unfortunately one of our gels had holes in it so I realized too late that our samples were leaking out so we have to redo those digestions. Also we’re doing a Western blot for the nonmutated “protein X” fragments (that we sent for sequencing). Anywho after locopops at the seminar today, Julie Stevenson and I are off to her house for the weekend. Look out for an update next week then!

Reflection on Responsible Conduct in Research

June 23rd, 2007 by Julie Sogani

This week the program focused on informing us about responsibility in research conduct. We were assigned to read a NY Times Magazine article entitled “An Unwelcome Discovery” by Jeneen Interlandi. On Wednesday, we saw the movie “And the Band Played On” about the arrival of the AIDS epidemic. Finally on Friday afternoon we attended a faculty seminar about research ethics lectured by Dave McClay. My first reaction when I read the NY Times article was how could Poehlman, a prominent scientist recognized around the world for his research, have forged fake data for nearly 10 years without anyone questioning his work. Surely someone, whether a colleague in the lab next door or a postdoc working in his lab, would have sooner recognized his scientific fraud? However, the question should be addressing not whether someone noticed but if there was anyone willing to actually report it? Walter DeNino, the young lab technician who brought Poehlman’s case to officials, had talked previously with others who worked in the lab about discrepancies in Poehlman’s data and found that they too believed something was not right. Though the ethically correct decision would have been to consult someone about Poehlman’s false data, by doing so, they would put their own careers at stake if they were wrong. When approached by DeNino, Dwight Matthews, a scientist who shared a lab space with Poehlman, bluntly put it, “Your career will be ruined because no one is going to protect you”.

 

In a world where people are constantly competing and hoping to be the “first” in their field of expertise, sacrifices whether good or bad are made, including the decision to do what’s ethically right. In “And the Band Played On”, this issue appeared again, as controversy arose when Dr. Robert Gallo of the US claimed to be the first to identify the AIDS virus when the French at Pasteur Institute had previously discovered the identical virus. Poehlman and Gallo (as depicted in the movie) appear to have both breached proper conduct in research by forging/stealing respectively their results to gain federal grants and recognition. But can they be completely blamed? As I have learned a career in research is not as steady a job as it may appear. As my mentor explained, the P.I. spends countless hours writing grant proposals to secure the money necessary to conduct new experiments and keep his or her lab running. I heard just a few weeks ago, a nearby lab which had been around for many years was forced to shut down due to lack of money. And to think they could have been on their way to finding the next therapy to some disease but because of money and competition they were deprived of that chance. It’s just like in the movie when the Centers for Disease Control tried hard to secure grants to support preliminary research on AIDS but did not even receive enough money to buy an electron microscope. As it is there is not enough money secured for research, so when people like Poehlman or Gallo abuse the system, they essentially hurt other researchers from finding the next big discovery.

But going back to ethics, deciding between doing what’s right and putting your career on the line is an extremely difficult choice scientists must face everyday and those who do follow through with upholding responsible conduct in the lab, whether they produce Nobel-prize winning discoveries or not, should be lauded for their efforts. In response to McClay’s lecture, I thought he made a very good point about how irresponsible conduct in research is most of the time the result of carelessness, laziness, ignorance, etc. instead of intentional fabrication/plagiarizing. Those forms of irresponsible conduct target researchers like us students who are having our first experience in the lab. So while it might not be our intention to alter the results of an experiment, we must be alert of our actions while at the bench and make sure to always ask our mentors questions if we’re unsure of something. My main takeway from the article, movie, and seminar were that one should be aware of the consequences of their actions in the lab in order to prevent ourselves from hurting others in the long run.

 

The Big Question

June 19th, 2007 by Julie Sogani

Here’s an overview of my project. If you want to learn more, come to hear my chalk talk next week!

Protein-protein interaction between ”Protein X” and ALK-1

Big Picture:
Transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) is a regulator of multiple cellular processes including proliferation, differentiation, and cell survival. Specific cell surface receptors bind to the TGFβ ligand and initiate an intracellular signaling cascade through the phosphorylation of transcription factors, the Smads.                                                                                                                        Here is a picture of the canonical TGF-beta signaling pathway.  (Blobe, GC, Schiemann WP, Lodish HF. Role of transforming growth factor beta in human disease. N Engl J Med. 2000 May 4;342(18):1350-8.)

One specific TGFβ receptor, ALK-1, expressed specifically on endothelial cells is essential for angiogenesis. A mutation of ALK-1 is proposed to result in the disease hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia type 2 (HHT-2). HHT is an autosomal dominant disease characterized by vascular dysplasia. ALK-1 has been shown to interact with several intracellular binding partners. One such partner has been identified as the regulatory subunit of “protein X”. Studying how ALK-1 interacts with these other proteins might allow us to better understand the ALK-1 signaling pathway and propose a way to target the pathway and treat such a devastating human disease.

Research Questions:
1) Do “protein X” and ALK-1 interact?
Yes, according to yeast two hybrid screen performed previously and confirmed by GST pull-down and co-immunoprecipitation experiments                                                                          

2a) Where is the binding site for ALK-1 on “protein X”?
-Hypothesis: somewhere near the C-terminus (similar to other serine/threonine kinases)
-What we’re working on now (Week of June 4/11/17): Molecular Cloning of Truncation Mutants of “Protein X”—creating plasmids that contain fragments of “protein X” to identify the location of binding site

PCR –> Restriction digests –> Ligation –> Transformation into bacteria –> Prep DNA –> Confirm our cloning strategy –> Pull-down assay to confirm interaction –> When confirmed, site-directed mutagenesis to further localize

2b) Where is the binding site for ”protein X” on ALK-1?
Conduct site-directed mutagenesis (instead of previous cloning strategy because truncation mutants will be more difficult given the proposed binding site location on ALK-1)

3) What is the significance of binding on ALK-1 signaling and ”protein X” signaling?

- Is there phosphorylation between molecules? (in vitro kinase assay)

-How does “protein X” affect ALK-1 signaling through the Smads?

(Western blot using phospho-specific Smad antibodies/reporter assays)

-Does ALK-1 binding affect “protein X” activity on its targets?

300 targets—several potentials for TGFβ and ”protein X” pathway overlap, such as transcription factor NF-kβ

These may seem like a lot of questions but really the main purpose of all of them is to further investigate the interaction between ALK-1 and “protein X”. Also I don’t think I will be able to work on answering all these questions during the summer program so I will concentrate mostly on Questions 2a/b in finding the location of interaction.

 

Busy Week…with Much Troubleshooting

June 19th, 2007 by Julie Sogani

The last couple of days have been the busiest by far with days lasting from 9am to 6:30pm and coming in on the weekend Well that’s research for you! Though I can’t complain since most of the time is down-time when I’m waiting for proteins to bind, DNA to replicate, etc. Jack and I have been trying to construct and clone truncation mutants of the regulatory subunit of “protein X” which we believe interacts with our protein of interest, ALK-1. I’ll talk more about the details in my next post). Using a computer simulation program, PDraw, we planned out primers with specific restriction sites that we could use for PCR. While we waited for our primers to arrive, we went ahead and started a restriction digest with a previous aliquot of “protein X”, running a ligation over night, and transforming DH5-alpha bacteria with the “protein X” and vector constructs the next day. Additionally to show me how he had previously confirmed the existence of an interaction between ”protein X” and ALK-1, we started a Western Blot that confirmed the protein-protein interaction between the two molecules through a pull-down assay.                                                                                                                                                                                                                            As soon as the primers arrived two days later, we dived into conducting some PCR, restriction digests, gel purification, ligation, transformation…But wait we still had to purify the DNA from the DH5-alpha bacteria through a miniprep and run it on a gel to check if it worked alright…Oh and how could I forget, we needed to add the antibodies to our Western blot…essentially by Thursday, we were doing three experiments at once! While it was confusing switching between experiments (I have twelve pages of notes for Thursday and Friday alone!) it saved us lots of time–by the time we finished the first experiment and found it yield unsuccessful results, we could look on the bright side that we hadn’t wasted 4 days just doing that one experiment but still had two others in progress. Unfortunately out of the three experiments only one worked and so this week we are repeating our cloning but slightly tweaking our strategies to troubleshoot. And if we’re lucky, Jack says we might get to start a site-directed mutagenesis where we will get to make mutated constructs of our molecules of interest. I’m going to write a proposal of my research project and post it soon so stay tuned.

Getting to Know Dr. Blobe

June 13th, 2007 by Julie Sogani

Yesterday I “interviewed” Dr. Blobe to find out how he got hooked on research. He has enjoyed science as long as he can remember and was proud to share with me the original copy of his first scientific paper, “The Effects of Diet Rate on Mice”…from his sixth grade science class! Although the material might be considered elementary, a glimpse of the paper showed the beginnings of a true “lab rat” as Dr. Blobe likes to refer to himself now. He continued to do research during high school and had his first research experience in a lab the summer after his freshman year at Notre Dame University. He recalls spending countless hours for six or even seven days a week (!) doing “manual labor” such as purifying ribonuleases, growing bacteria, and doing gel electrophoreses that today with the help of fancy smancy machines can be completed much more efficiently.                                                                                                                                                                                                                   After graduating with a chemistry major, Dr. Blobe went on to attend the MD/PhD program at Duke University. After completing the program, he went back to the lab for 2 years as a postdoc, got a research position while studying Protein Kinase C (PKC) and then his own lab at Duke. He recalled that the first few years were tough because in order to keep your lab you have to raise significant monetary support by writing many grants. Dr. Blobe chooses to employ all levels of researchers in his lab from undergraduates to medical students to post-docs “to provide them the opportunity and building blocks to figure out if they want to do research as a career”.                                                                                                                                                                                                                           A typical day for Dr. Blobe nowadays is as follows. He arrives at his office at 8 am and spends the day answering emails, writing grants/papers, reviewing papers, attending meetings/seminars, giving lectures to medical students/graduate students… On Tuesdays, he goes to the clinic to treat patients with colon and pancreatic cancer. At the end of the work day, he goes home, spends time with his kids, climbs on the Stairmaster while reading papers, and later spends about an hour more writing grants.  Dr. Blobe chose to conduct research particularly in cancer because he wants ”to make an impact in the future on the lives of patients with significant [medical] problems”. Finally when asked if he would like to share any last words, his first words were, “It’s the best job on earth!” He enjoys the ”constantly stimulating, changing, and growing environment and the opportunity to interact with bright, talented people.” Dr. Blobe-as both a researcher and mentor-hopes to make an impact on both the lives of patients as well as students interested in pursuing cancer research.                                                   

Welcome to the Blobe Lab

June 8th, 2007 by Julie Sogani

Welcome to my blog! As apart of the Howard Hughes Research Fellows Program I will be blogging about my summer experience and hope to share with you what I am learning. Dr. Blobe’s lab focuses on the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-B) signal transduction pathway and and its dichotomous role in both promoting and inhibiting tumorigenesis. I will be working with Jack (a Duke surgery resident currently doing research) to find if a particular protein-let’s call it “protein X” for our purposes- interacts with the TGF-B receptor, Alk-1, and then characterize its effect on receptor signaling.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          I have just finished my first week at the lab. On Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday I observed Jack as he taught me how to do a cell culture and transfection. On Thursday and Friday he had to attend a conference. As a resident, he is a likely target for pharmaceutical companies so his entire trip-transportation, hotel, and meals-has been provided for by a company. I guess that’s one of the perks of the medical profession ;)   So instead on Thursday I watched Liz (a fifth year graduate student) perform the final step-”detection”- of a Western Blot, i.e. incubation with a primary and secondary antibody and developing pictures of the gel. Unfortunately the results weren’t as good as Liz hoped. If I had worked nearly five days preparing and conducting such an experiment only to get so-so results I would expect to surely feel disappointed. Yet Liz didn’t appear to be too disappointed. As I have learned in the lab this past week, one shouldn’t expect to get great results his or her very first try (or even the third or fourth tries!) It takes time (and much tweaking) to get results that can even considered for publication. And though I was only in the lab for 2 hours today, I definitely had the most fun experience today. Because Jack is away, he bestowed on me the responsibility to take care of his cells so I got to do my very first cell culture!                                         Here’s  some pictures of the Blobe lab:                                               Jack at his bench pipetting for a transfection.                                       Liz and Ryan deep in conversation on the project they’re working on.                                And me at my very own desk with lots of reading to do.Thanks for reading my blog. Talk to you soon.